IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee
223 reviews matching your filters
Ian Okonkwo
Founder · 1-10 employees · Charity and non-profit
2 Apr 2024
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Aisha Sinclair
Operations manager · 51-200 employees · Logistics and transport
30 Mar 2024
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. No complaints so far.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.
Eleanor Kaur
Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Accounting
26 Mar 2024
It scaled with us without a change of platform, and paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. No complaints so far.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Rebecca Begum
Director · 1-10 employees · Property and lettings
11 Mar 2024
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. Only real gripe is that the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
David Bhatti
Bookkeeper · 11-50 employees · Construction
6 Mar 2024
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. Only real gripe is that it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Michael Osei
Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Veterinary
2 Mar 2024
Mixed. The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, but the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Bethany Adeyemi
Founder · 11-50 employees · Retail
2 Mar 2024
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, and paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Kevin Thornley
HR director · 501-1000 employees · Healthcare
29 Feb 2024
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Charlotte Fairbanks
Financial controller · 201-500 employees · Food and beverage
28 Feb 2024
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Pros
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Gareth Nowak
Management accountant · 201-500 employees · Hospitality
22 Feb 2024
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.